BullseyeCoverage vs Microsoft Code Coverage
| BullseyeCoverage | Microsoft Code Coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Coverage types | function coverage; condition/decision coverage | line, block, assembly, class, procedure, managed CLR, unmanaged native |
| Supported languages | C; C++ | C#, C++ |
| Report formats | HTML; text; annotated source code; XML; Cobertura; CSV | coverage, XML, Cobertura |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Specifiction, Microsoft Code Coverage scores higher on our published basis.