CaptureWebPage vs ScreenFloat
CaptureWebPage
capturewebpage.comScreenFloat
eternalstorms.atSide by side
| Figure | CaptureWebPage | ScreenFloat |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | — |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Spec score · Screen Capture Software | 8.7 (#5) | 7.7 (#31) |
| Permissions | Declared permissions cover current-tab access, scripting, tabs, storage, downloads, desktop capture, context menus, offscreen processing, and font settings. | Screen recording and audio permissions are used for captures and recordings; keyboard input is monitored only during a recording if the user enables highlighting of modifier keys and shortcuts. |
| Privacy | The privacy policy says screenshots, annotations, page details and preferences are processed and stored locally in the browser, and are not sent to the maker or anyone else. | The maker says ScreenFloat collects or transmits no data to the maker or third parties, and screenshots are stored locally unless the user opts into syncing or sharing. |
| Support | The extension includes an optional “Support the developer” link to Ko-fi, and the privacy policy lists an email address for questions or concerns. | The maker lists [email protected] as its contact address. |
Plans
In their own words
CaptureWebPage
CaptureWebPage has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
ScreenFloat
ScreenFloat has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.