Cargo vs Swift Package Manager
| Cargo | Swift Package Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Package formats | Rust crates; crates.io packages; alternate registry packages; Git dependencies; local path dependencies | source packages, system libraries, binary targets, package registry archives |
| Supported platforms | Windows; macOS; Linux; other Unix-like systems | macOS, Linux, Windows; packages can target Apple platforms |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | Yes |
| Lockfile support | Yes | Yes |
| Workspace support | Yes | — |
| Private registry auth | Yes | Yes |
| Offline installation | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers. On Specifiction, Cargo scores higher on our published basis.