Casely vs Testsigma

Casely turns software requirements into QA test cases through a conversation with Claude. It accepts PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, and Markdown files, as well as pasted text. Before writing cases, Casely proposes coverage by module, estimates case counts, flags specification gaps, and waits for approval. Its test design uses equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision tables, state transitions, and error guessing. The tool can follow the columns, order, tone, and ID scheme of an existing test-case file. Exports include one Excel file and a Markdown file for each case; the Excel output is described as importable into TestRail, Qase, Zephyr, and Xray. When requirements identify API endpoints, it can create a Postman collection with an environment file and run instructions, without embedding credentials. Casely runs with Claude Code, claude.ai, and the Claude desktop app. A browser version with uploads and team review is in early access. The QA skill is free, open source, and MIT-licensed.

Testsigma is a platform for planning, designing, executing, analyzing, reporting on and maintaining automated tests. Users can author tests in simple English without programming knowledge. Its AI agents can generate tests from user stories, product requirements documents, Figma designs or existing suites, then execute, analyze and heal them. It supports web, mobile web, Android, iOS and API projects, with unlimited counts for each application type listed on its pricing page. Tests can run in parallel across 3000+ browsers and real devices, locally or in the cloud. Listed integrations include Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest. Testsigma lists a free plan and trial; Test Management Pro costs $14 a month, billed at $14 per user per month. Pro and Enterprise pricing is custom. Enterprise lists public, private or on-prem cloud deployment, a private grid, IP whitelisting and local testing.