Ceph vs StorONE
Ceph
ceph.ioStorONE
storone.comSide by side
| Figure | Ceph | StorONE |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Spec score · Storage Management Software | 8.8 (#1) | 7.2 (#17) |
| Data protection | Ceph can replicate data across devices, racks, and geographic locations, and redistribute data after hardware or connectivity failures. | The platform includes immutable snapshots, snapshot locking, replication, MFA, multi-admin authorization, audit logging, and encryption capabilities. |
| Deployment | Ceph runs on commodity hardware and can be installed and managed with cephadm or deployed on Kubernetes with Rook. | StorONE says its software installs on standard hardware and describes support for any server, drive, or cloud. |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
| Integrations | The documentation lists integrations for block devices including Kubernetes, QEMU, libvirt, OpenStack, Nomad, and CloudStack. | StorONE lists support from backup vendors including HYCU, Commvault, Veeam, and IBM. |
| Licensing | Most of Ceph is dual-licensed under LGPL version 2.1 or 3.0, while some bundled components use other free software licenses. | StorONE says licensing is per drive rather than per capacity, and that replacing drives with higher-capacity drives does not change the license cost. |
| Support | The maker directs users to documentation, the ceph-users mailing list, community channels, and the bug tracker for help. | StorONE offers professional services and invites customers to request a personalized demo. |
| Who it is for | Ceph describes its users as including businesses, cloud providers, universities, and research institutions. | StorONE describes its platform as serving enterprise organizations and workloads across multiple environments. |
Plans
In their own words
Ceph
Ceph is free, open-source distributed storage software for object, block, and file storage in one system. Organizations run clusters on commodity hardware that they choose and manage. Its RGW object storage supports the S3 API and Swift-compatible applications. RBD provides thin-provisioned disk images, snapshots, writable clones, and asynchronous mirroring to remote Ceph clusters. CephFS is a POSIX-compliant distributed filesystem with snapshots, quotas, and multi-cluster mirroring. The system can replicate data across devices, racks, and geographic locations, then redistribute it following hardware or connectivity failures. For Kubernetes, the project recommends Rook to run Ceph or connect an existing cluster; its CSI driver can provision block and file volumes. Installation choices include packages, container images, source clones, and tarballs. The cephadm tool requires Python 3, systemd, and Podman or Docker. Production guidance calls for at least three monitors, two managers, three OSDs, and 10 Gb/s networking between hosts. The project publishes a stable release annually and supports each series for approximately 24 months.