Chocolatey vs Rattler
Chocolatey
chocolatey.orgRattler
github.comSide by side
| Figure | Chocolatey | Rattler |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $1.50/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | — | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 4 | 0 |
| Spec score · Package Managers | 9.1 (#2) | 7.8 (#47) |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Tool integrations | Chocolatey integrates through custom integrations or PowerShell and batch scripts. | The project says Rattler is actively used by Pixi, rattler-build, and the prefix.dev backend. |
| Lockfile support | Yes | Yes |
| Package formats | nupkg,nuspec,packages.config | .conda,.tar.bz2 |
| Private registry auth | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Windows; Linux; macOS | Windows,macOS,Linux,browser,Node.js |
Plans
Chocolatey
- Open SourceFree
- Pro$96 a year
- Business (C4B)$18 a year
- Chocolatey for Business PerpetualPriced on request
In their own words
Chocolatey
Chocolatey has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.