Cloud 66 vs Jamcracker

Cloud 66 deploys and manages applications on cloud infrastructure customers provide, including major providers, hybrid environments, and their own servers. It supports Rails or Sinatra apps, Docker containers on Kubernetes, and static sites built with Jekyll, Hugo, or Gatsby. Deployment options include zero-downtime, blue/green, and canary deployments, plus previews for branches, tags, and pull requests. Hosted Docker build servers and autoscaling based on CPU, memory, queue backlog, and Nginx response time are available. Managed databases can include off-site backups, replication, and monitoring; the platform also provides server monitoring, alerts, logs, and metrics. Listed cloud providers include AWS, DigitalOcean, Google Compute Engine, Hetzner Cloud, Latitude.sh, Linode, OVHcloud, Microsoft Azure, and Vultr. Cloud 66 says it does not store customer code or data on its servers. Customers pay their cloud provider directly for server costs. The Free plan is free for up to one server, one static site, and five deployments per 24 hours. Developer is $23 a month and supports up to two servers and two static sites.

Jamcracker is a cloud management platform for governing, automating and optimizing services from one console. It provides a multi-tier catalog for SaaS, PaaS and IaaS, with self-service provisioning and subscription, metered, one-time or tiered pricing. The orchestration engine handles provisioning, deployment, scaling and lifecycle management across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Supported providers include AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, VMware, OpenStack and private clouds, with on-premise and cloud deployment models. Cost tools cover analytics, budgeting, forecasting, chargeback, showback, price comparisons and FinOps workflows. LDAP and SAML authentication, single sign-on, policy enforcement and role-based permissions manage access. Reporting can mask or encrypt sensitive data and audit report use. APIs connect CRM, ERP, ITSM, payment gateways and external catalogs, while Ansible supports configuration and infrastructure-as-code workflows. Pricing is on request.