Codacy vs Ironwood AI
Codacy
codacy.comIronwood AI
ironwoodsolutions.aiSide by side
| Figure | Codacy | Ironwood AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $1.50/mo | $15/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 4 | 4 |
| Spec score · AI Code Review Tools | 8.3 (#12) | 8.3 (#13) |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | Sydney, Australia |
| Support | The Business plan offers a dedicated customer success manager and premium support. | Ironwood can generate a sanitised support bundle for review before sharing; its support workflow is designed not to automatically upload source code or provider credentials. |
Plans
Codacy
- DeveloperFree
- Team (Yearly)$18 a year
- Team (Monthly)$21 a month
- BusinessPriced on request
Ironwood AI
- EvaluationFree
- Professional$15 a month
- Team$200 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
Codacy
Codacy is a cloud platform for engineering teams focused on code quality, security, and AI coding standards. Its AI Reviewer reviews pull requests with fix suggestions and summaries, and can identify false positives automatically. Listed security capabilities include SAST, software composition analysis, secret scanning, infrastructure-as-code scanning, DAST, and container image scanning. Team offers shared coding standards across 49 languages, integrations for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Jira, and Slack, and capacity for up to 30 developers and 100 private repositories with unlimited lines of code. Developer includes an IDE plugin and integrations for VSCode, JetBrains, and Cursor; the IDE extension comparison also names Windsurf. Developer costs nothing. Team costs $18 a year with yearly billing or $21 a month with monthly billing, billed per developer per month. A 14-day free trial is available without a credit card. Codacy states that it is GDPR compliant and has SOC 2 Type II compliance; its services run on AWS, with data in transit encrypted using TLS.
Ironwood AI
Ironwood AI reviews code using AI providers selected by the team, along with engineering context such as coding standards, architecture documents, requirements, and technical guidance. Engineers can inspect findings and supporting evidence before deciding what to do. Teams can review multiple repositories in a batch, including cross-repository analysis when service boundaries matter. Listed AI providers include OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and Ollama; source-control integrations include GitHub, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket. Jira, Azure Boards, and Confluence are listed for delivery workflows. Ironwood runs on infrastructure controlled by the customer, with local Admin, Reviewer, and Viewer roles; customers manage source-control and AI-provider credentials. Hosted AI providers receive review prompts and selected code or context, while Ollama can keep the AI request inside customer infrastructure. Ironwood says it does not need to receive or store source code, prompts, or findings to run a review. Professional includes PDF reports, role-based access control, platform health, and diagnostics. Evaluation is free for 30 days for two developers and one installation. Professional costs $15 a month; Team is $200 a month for up to 20 developers. AI-provider usage is billed separately.