Codequiry vs Plagium

Codequiry checks submitted source code for plagiarism and AI-generated code, helping educators verify that student work is their own. It compares submissions with peer work, web sources, and historical material. The company says more than 20 analysis engines examine code structure and logic, not just textual matches, and that the system flags code associated with ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Claude, and Gemini. It supports more than 65 programming languages, including Python, Java, C/C++, JavaScript, C#, Go, and Rust. Instructors can review similarity scores and side-by-side matches, with matching lines highlighted. Grow includes a web dashboard, desktop client, and API/CLI access; all three listed plans include unlimited MCP calls. Advanced includes LMS integrations, while Scale offers custom LMS and SIS integrations built to spec. The pricing page states FERPA and GDPR compliance, SOC 2 Type II certification, TLS 1.3 encryption, and AES-256 encryption at rest. Uploaded code on plans without Rapid may be retained indefinitely in an anonymized comparison corpus and cannot be deleted on request. Grow costs €25.76 a month; a one-day trial is available and there is no free plan.

Plagium analyzes text for similarity with other material and offers a separate tool for identifying patterns compatible with AI-generated writing. Its plagiarism service compares submitted text with an online database and reports similarities with links to original sources. The AI Detector uses statistical and probabilistic analysis of writing patterns. Deep Search accepts Microsoft Word, PDF, and native text files; Google Drive integration and a Google Docs add-on support document analysis. Institutional users can access an API, while business solutions can integrate with corporate CRM, ERP, and document-management systems. Plagium presents solutions for educational institutions, publishers, editors, companies, researchers, and compliance teams. The free account costs nothing and allows five daily searches with a 4,000-character limit, but excludes Deep Search and API access. Plagium says submitted content remains owned by the user and is processed for analysis, report generation, and service improvement. Reports are automated estimates rather than definitive proof, and private, unpublished, or non-indexed material may not be detected.