Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

ComPAIR vs PeerEvals

ComPAIR

github.com

PeerEvals

peerevals.app

Side by side

FigureComPAIRPeerEvals
Price from—Free
Free plan—Yes
Free trial——
Open source——
WebYesYes
Self-hostedYes—
Plans published01
Spec score · Peer Assessment Software7.8 (#7)7.2 (#9)
PurposeComPAIR is a peer review application that pairs student answers so students can compare peer work and give feedback.A third-party product listing describes PeerEvals as a free web-based peer assessment platform for educators managing group projects and team-based learning.

Plans

ComPAIR

No plans published.

ComPAIR pricing →

PeerEvals

  • FreeFree

PeerEvals pricing →

In their own words

ComPAIR

ComPAIR is a self-hosted web application for peer review in which students compare pairs of work and give feedback with both answers in view. Instructors can enable adaptive scores based on comparison outcomes and use them to assemble later pairs. The application has student, instructor, and system administrator roles with distinct permissions, plus rubric scoring and moderation tools. It supports LTI login, course membership, and grade updates; administrators configure LTI consumers with a key and secret. Documented authentication options also include username and password, CAS, and SAML 2.0. Learning analytics can be sent to a Learning Record Store through xAPI or Caliper, though both are disabled by default. The default attachment limit is 250 MB, with PDF, audio, video, and image extensions allowed. Administrators can manage whether instructors see student email addresses and CAS/SAML usernames; those fields are disabled by default. ComPAIR is open source under GPL-3.0 and freely available to download, install, and use. Its README documents deployment with Docker Compose, with access at localhost:8080. The tool is described as suitable for higher education and K-12 communities.

Visit github.com

PeerEvals

PeerEvals is a free web-based peer assessment platform for educators running group projects and team-based learning. Instructors can define rubric criteria and organize evaluations into multiple phases, with deadlines and timezone support for each phase. Dashboards and heat maps show progress, while reports and data exports support review of results. CSV imports handle student and group data, and role-based access separates student, teacher, and administrator workflows. The listing identifies rubric scoring and says a paid tier is not required for the core job. Instructor account requests are reviewed by an administrator. Students do not register through that page; instructors add them to the class. PeerEvals does not include AI-assisted evaluation features, so the listed workflow centers on rubrics, phased evaluations, progress tracking, and reporting. It is accessed on the web. These account and workflow details matter when planning how a class will be set up and who will initiate participation.

Visit peerevals.app