Conan vs Swift Package Manager
| Conan | Swift Package Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Package formats | Conan recipes and binary packages | source packages, system libraries, binary targets, package registry archives |
| Supported platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, embedded and bare-metal targets | macOS, Linux, Windows; packages can target Apple platforms |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | Yes |
| Lockfile support | Yes | Yes |
| Workspace support | Yes | — |
| Private registry auth | Yes | Yes |
| Offline installation | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers. On Specifiction, Conan scores higher on our published basis.