ControlVista vs OrviQ

ControlVista is an internal audit management system covering risk-based planning, fieldwork, reporting, and remediation. VistaPlan scores auditable entities by weighted risk and supports capacity-matched annual plans, scheduling, and board approval. VistaField handles walkthroughs, control testing, evidence capture, working papers, and preparer-reviewer-approver sign-off. VistaResolve tracks management responses and remediation with ageing, overdue tracking, and threshold-based escalation. VistaReport drafts engagement reports and audit opinions and provides live assurance dashboards and committee packs. VistaAssist uses AI to draft procedures, workpaper summaries, findings, reports, and committee materials; auditors review and own the editable drafts. ControlVista connects to in-house systems and an organisation’s SSO or identity provider. It runs in a customer-controlled data centre or private cloud, with no outbound telemetry of engagement content and no vendor access to audit evidence, according to the maker. Source-code escrow is available, while the customer controls backups, recovery, and update timing. English and Arabic are supported, with alignment to IIA Standards 2024, COSO Internal Control, and ISO 19011. On-premise pricing is a fixed annual fee quoted during procurement.

OrviQ is an API and web enterprise governance, risk, and compliance platform linking regulatory requirements with internal controls and verified evidence. Its workflow moves from regulatory document ingestion and AI-assisted obligation extraction through requirement structuring, control mapping, assessment, evidence, findings, remediation, monitoring, and reporting. AI extraction remains advisory until a human reviewer accepts it. Control Assurance covers design and operating-effectiveness assessments, RCSA campaign waves, and second-line validation. Residual risk can be linked to assurance conclusions, KRI threshold breaches, and open audit findings. Modules cover regulatory compliance, risk management, findings and remediation, policy governance, audit, inspections, operational resilience, and third-party risk. The catalogue documents 20 available integrations, including Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Azure, Microsoft 365, AWS, Google Cloud, VMware, ServiceNow, Jira, and GitHub or GitLab; Splunk and Microsoft Sentinel are planned only. Tenant isolation, centrally enforced permissions, append-only audit logs, encrypted credential storage, malware scanning, rate limiting, CSRF protection, and health checks are described. Pricing is on request and modules are licensed per tenant.