Covexe vs Litstream
Covexe
covexe.comLitstream
icf.comSide by side
| Figure | Covexe | Litstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $8.25/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 4 | 0 |
| Spec score · Systematic Review Software | 8.1 (#7) | 6.8 (#27) |
| Headquarters | Taipei, Taiwan | ICF says it relocated its headquarters to Fairfax, Virginia, in 1987. |
| Intended users | Covexe says it is built for evidence-synthesis researchers and organizations including universities, research laboratories, public health institutes, hospitals, and independent researchers. | ICF says its literature review tools have been used by state and federal agencies, nonprofits, watchdogs, and private researchers. |
| Purpose | Covexe is a browser-based platform for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, evidence synthesis, and applied statistics. | Litstream helps researchers collaborate on literature screening and data extraction while tracking review work across team members. |
| Review workflow | Its review module covers question and search, screening, full-text review, extraction, appraisal, synthesis, and reporting. | Managers can design review steps, assign work, and monitor progress at a granular level. |
| Support | Email support is available at [email protected], with replies stated to arrive within 1–2 business days. | ICF offers expert support across review design and execution, including search strategies, criteria, study quality assessment, data integration, and training for collaborators. |
Plans
In their own words
Covexe
Covexe is a browser-based platform for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, evidence synthesis, and applied statistics. Its review workflow spans question and search, screening, full-text review, extraction, appraisal, synthesis, and reporting. It supports systematic, scoping, network meta-analysis, diagnostic accuracy, umbrella, rapid, and narrative reviews. Methods include pairwise and network meta-analysis, GRADE ratings, risk-of-bias tools, and a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram; the statistics suite covers regression, survival analysis, diagnostic accuracy, and other methods checked against R packages and implementations. References can be imported in RIS, NBIB, BibTeX, PubMed XML, CSV, and Excel formats, with duplicates detected by DOI and PMID. Users can connect their own OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google AI key. The co-pilot pauses for approval at checkpoints, and AI screening will not exclude a study without user approval. Signed-out work stays in the browser; signed-in reviews are stored for cloud sync and sharing. The free plan costs nothing, while Pro costs $99 a year. Team costs $150 a year per seat with a three-seat minimum.