Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

Covidence vs Universal SLR Assistant

Covidence

covidence.org

Universal SLR Assistant

sadeghanisi.github.io

Side by side

FigureCovidenceUniversal SLR Assistant
Price from$28.25/moFree
Free plan—Yes
Free trialYes—
Open source—Yes
WebYesYes
Windows—Yes
macOS—Yes
Linux—Yes
API—Yes
Self-hosted—Yes
Plans published31
Spec score · AI Literature Review Software8.0 (#13)8.2 (#10)
Spec score · Systematic Review Software7.9 (#13)8.2 (#6)
PurposeCovidence is a non-profit platform that helps researchers systematically review research.Universal SLR Assistant supports systematic and scoping review workflows with AI-assisted screening, extraction, and reproducible outputs.
Review workflowThe platform supports review setup, importing, screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and export.The workflow covers reference import, abstract screening, full-text PDF processing, structured extraction, and export.
SupportThe contact page says the support team usually replies within one business day; pricing also includes free online technical support.The project directs users to the Complete User Guide, in-app Help panel, output logs, tests, and GitHub issues for support.

Plans

Covidence

  • Single$339 a year
  • Package$907 a year
  • InstitutionsPriced on request

Covidence pricing →

Universal SLR Assistant

  • Free and open sourceFree

Universal SLR Assistant pricing →

In their own words

Covidence

Covidence has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

Visit covidence.org

Universal SLR Assistant

Universal SLR Assistant supports systematic and scoping reviews with AI-assisted screening, extraction, and reproducible outputs. It provides a desktop interface and a browser-based local Web App, and imports RIS, BibTeX, CSV, and plain-text references, including exports from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Its workflow covers abstract screening, full-text PDF processing, structured extraction, and export; likely duplicates are identified by DOI and fuzzy title matching. Workspace mode stores references, PDF metadata, review items, decisions, and audit events in a local SQLite workspace, separating AI suggestions from human decisions. Exports can include decision files and logs, exclusion reasons, PRISMA-ready counts, a methods disclosure draft, and a manifest. The project supports a range of cloud and local AI providers. Cloud providers receive submitted paper text, while Ollama or another local endpoint can keep it on the user's computer or local network. AI results are assistance only: people must verify them and make final review and reporting decisions. The software is free under the MIT License; cloud AI provider API fees may apply.

Visit sadeghanisi.github.io