Cubic vs Macroscope
Cubic
cubic.devMacroscope
macroscope.comSide by side
| Figure | Cubic | Macroscope |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $30/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 13 | 7 |
| Spec score · AI Code Review Tools | 9.3 (#2) | 7.8 (#25) |
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | The Agent works in Slack, GitHub comments, API, and Macros, and lists Jira, Linear, BigQuery, PostHog, Amplitude, LaunchDarkly, Sentry, GCP logs, and MCP connectors as connected services. |
| Product | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. | Macroscope provides AI code review, commit intelligence, and an AI agent for engineering teams working on GitHub. |
| Security | cubic says it is SOC 2 Type I compliant, encrypts data in transit with TLS 1.2+ and at rest with AES-256, and prohibits its AI providers from training on customer code. | Macroscope states that it is SOC 2 Type II certified, encrypts data at rest and in transit, and does not use customer code for model training. |
| Support | The Pro and Max plans include premium support and a shared Slack channel with cubic engineers, while Enterprise offers dedicated support. | The Enterprise offering lists priority support, and Macroscope provides support by email at [email protected]. |
Plans
Cubic
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
- Max$160 a month
- Max$160 a month
Macroscope
- Agent$0.01, paid once
- Code Review — Budget$0.03, paid once
- Code Review — Balanced$0.05, paid once
- Status$0.05, paid once
- Code Review — Precise$0.06, paid once
- Code Review — Ultra$0.20, paid once
- EnterprisePriced on request
In their own words
Cubic
Cubic reviews pull requests with AI and scans codebases for bugs and security issues. It checks proposed changes against the wider codebase and team rules, including possible effects on other code, and learns from senior developers’ past comments and team feedback. The workflow can auto-approve low-risk pull requests, assign a merge confidence score from 1 to 5, and let coding agents fix findings. Cubic supports GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Cloud; GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported yet. It describes itself as language-agnostic and lists JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java and C# among supported languages. Starter Free allows 20 reviews a month for public repositories. Team costs $30 a month billed yearly per developer; Pro is 79.00 USD and Max is $160 a month, also billed yearly per developer. For pull requests with more than 200 eligible files, Cubic selects up to 200 for review. Reviews pause after a team exceeds its line allowance unless an admin enables flex capacity at $20 per 10,000 extra lines.
Macroscope
Macroscope has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.