Cubic vs PullFlow
Cubic
cubic.dev
PullFlow
pullflow.comSide by side
| Figure | Cubic | PullFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $30/mo | $5/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 13 | 3 |
| Spec score · Code review software | 9.3 (#2) | 8.3 (#20) |
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | The feature comparison lists GitHub Actions, external CI/CD, and check runs alongside GitHub, Slack, and VS Code sync. |
| Product | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. | PullFlow is a code review collaboration platform for human and AI teams. |
| Security certification | The security documentation identifies Cubic as SOC 2 Type 1 compliant. | PullFlow states that it is SOC 2 Type II compliant and offers its report on request. |
| Support | The Pro and Max plans include premium support and a shared Slack channel with cubic engineers, while Enterprise offers dedicated support. | The pricing comparison lists community support for Free, email support for Team, and email and chat support for Enterprise. |
Plans
Cubic
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
- Max$160 a month
- Max$160 a month
In their own words
Cubic
Cubic reviews pull requests with AI and scans codebases for bugs and security issues. It checks proposed changes against the wider codebase and team rules, including possible effects on other code, and learns from senior developers’ past comments and team feedback. The workflow can auto-approve low-risk pull requests, assign a merge confidence score from 1 to 5, and let coding agents fix findings. Cubic supports GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Cloud; GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported yet. It describes itself as language-agnostic and lists JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java and C# among supported languages. Starter Free allows 20 reviews a month for public repositories. Team costs $30 a month billed yearly per developer; Pro is 79.00 USD and Max is $160 a month, also billed yearly per developer. For pull requests with more than 200 eligible files, Cubic selects up to 200 for review. Reviews pause after a team exceeds its line allowance unless an admin enables flex capacity at $20 per 10,000 extra lines.
PullFlow
PullFlow is a code review collaboration platform for people and AI agents working on GitHub pull requests. It syncs identities and review activity across GitHub, Slack and VS Code, and surfaces pull requests awaiting attention. Users can set reminders, nudge reviewers, request reviews, change labels, give feedback and approve pull requests through Slack or IDE shortcuts. PullFlow’s AI agent and third-party agents including Copilot, CodeRabbit and Greptile can participate in PR threads. The feature comparison also lists GitHub Actions, external CI/CD and check runs. The extension is available for VS Code, Cursor and Antigravity; listed platforms also include web, Linux, macOS and Windows. A free plan supports unlimited public repositories and up to five users for private repositories. Team costs $5/user/mo, with yearly billing offered at 30% off, and includes unlimited paid users and repositories. Enterprise lists private cloud or on-premise installation, audit and access controls, and single sign-on. PullFlow says it requests pull request metadata and comments rather than source code, and that its SOC 2 Type II report is available on request.