Cubic vs ReviewSensei
Cubic
cubic.dev
ReviewSensei
reviewsensei.devSide by side
| Figure | Cubic | ReviewSensei |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $30/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 13 | 0 |
| Spec score · Code review software | 9.3 (#2) | 7.4 (#42) |
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | The site offers a GitHub App, GitHub Action, and CLI, and its provider matrix lists Ollama, Ollama Cloud, OpenAI-compatible, and OpenRouter support with different workflow availability. |
| Learning | cubic learns from senior developers’ past review comments and from team feedback on its suggestions. | Proposed repository learnings can become draft pull requests and require maintainer approval before future selection for matching paths. |
| What it does | Cubic reviews GitHub pull requests with repository-wide context and scans complete codebases for bugs, vulnerabilities and regressions. | ReviewSensei is an open-source engine for AI reviews of GitHub pull requests using repository-owned knowledge, configurable review stages, and explicit coverage. |
Plans
Cubic
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
- Max$160 a month
- Max$160 a month
In their own words
Cubic
Cubic reviews pull requests with AI and scans codebases for bugs and security issues. It checks proposed changes against the wider codebase and team rules, including possible effects on other code, and learns from senior developers’ past comments and team feedback. The workflow can auto-approve low-risk pull requests, assign a merge confidence score from 1 to 5, and let coding agents fix findings. Cubic supports GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Cloud; GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported yet. It describes itself as language-agnostic and lists JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java and C# among supported languages. Starter Free allows 20 reviews a month for public repositories. Team costs $30 a month billed yearly per developer; Pro is 79.00 USD and Max is $160 a month, also billed yearly per developer. For pull requests with more than 200 eligible files, Cubic selects up to 200 for review. Reviews pause after a team exceeds its line allowance unless an admin enables flex capacity at $20 per 10,000 extra lines.
ReviewSensei
ReviewSensei has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.