Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

Cucumber Open vs Eclipse SWTBot

Cucumber Open

cucumber.io

Eclipse SWTBot

projects.eclipse.org

Side by side

FigureCucumber OpenEclipse SWTBot
Price fromFree—
Free planYes—
Free trial——
Open source——
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
AndroidYes—
APIYes—
Plans published10
Spec score · Automated Testing8.4 (#12)6.1 (#30)
Founded20082008

Plans

Cucumber Open

  • Cucumber OpenFree

Cucumber Open pricing →

Eclipse SWTBot

No plans published.

Eclipse SWTBot pricing →

In their own words

Cucumber Open

Cucumber Open runs automated acceptance tests from specifications written in plain language, helping teams check whether software behaves as described. It supports Behaviour-Driven Development by executing Gherkin specifications saved in `.feature` text files, typically alongside software in source control. Step definitions link the specification's steps to code that carries them out. Official implementations include JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Android Java, Kotlin, Scala, and C++, with semi-official and unofficial implementations also listed. Gherkin has variations for spoken languages, so teams can use keywords in their own language. Reporting options include built-in HTML, JSON, JUnit, and progress formatters, as well as custom formatters. Cucumber can run in continuous integration environments; its documentation describes JUnit output and a Jenkins reporting plugin. The project is free and open source, with local execution, parallel execution, browser testing, and API access. Published Cucumber Reports are public without authentication and deleted after 24 hours; the report service says data is stored in US data centers and encrypted at rest.

Visit cucumber.io

Eclipse SWTBot

Eclipse SWTBot has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

Visit projects.eclipse.org