Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Gitsign

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted

docs.venafi.com

Gitsign

github.com

Side by side

FigureCyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-HostedGitsign
Price from——
Free plan——
Free trial——
Open source——
WebYes—
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
APIYes—
Self-hostedYes—
Plans published00
Spec score · Code Signing Software7.9 (#9)5.9 (#27)

In their own words

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted

CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted protects and governs private code signing keys managed by Trust Protection Foundation. Keys can be held in the platform’s Secret Store or on an HSM. Administrators can set restrictions based on purpose, user, and IP address, and configure whether signing requires approvals. Approval flows can have multiple levels, limited-use approvals, and expiration options; approvers receive email notifications to review requests. The system audits key use, and APIs expose event logs and signing statistics. REST APIs can request signing, manage projects and environments, set user rights, inspect logs, and approve or reject requests. Identities and groups can be added through Active Directory or an LDAP provider and assigned roles in signing projects. Clients are available for Windows, Linux, and macOS, with interfaces including CSP/KSP, PKCS#11, GPG, and macOS Keychain; .NET is listed for Windows. GPG private keys remain within Trust Protection Foundation while public keys and private-key stubs synchronize to workstations. Installation is part of a Trust Protection Foundation deployment and requires several listed components, including Certificate Lifecycle and Monitoring, Key Lifecycle and Monitoring, HSM Backend, Authentication Server, Web Console, and Web SDK. Pricing is on request.

Visit docs.venafi.com

Gitsign

Gitsign has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

Visit github.com