Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

CyberSecEval vs LLM Guard

CyberSecEval

meta-llama.github.io

LLM Guard

github.com

Side by side

FigureCyberSecEvalLLM Guard
Price fromFreeFree
Free planYesYes
Free trial——
Open sourceYes—
WebYes—
macOSYes—
LinuxYesYes
APIYesYes
Self-hostedYesYes
Plans published11
Spec score · LLM Security Tools8.9 (#1)7.6 (#11)
Spec score · AI Guardrail Software9.0 (#1)7.7 (#9)
InstallationThe documented setup creates a Python virtual environment and installs dependencies from requirements.txt.The project documents installation with `pip install llm-guard` and requires Python 3.9 or higher.
Intended usersThe project describes itself as tools and evaluations intended to help the community build responsibly with open generative AI models.The project describes production deployment and offers tutorials for developers building LLM applications, including guarded RAG and agent workflows.
LicenseCybersecurity evaluations and benchmarks in Purple Llama are licensed under MIT, while included Llama safeguard models use separate Llama Community licenses.The GitHub repository lists the project under the MIT License.
PurposeCyberSecEval 4 is a benchmark suite for assessing cybersecurity vulnerabilities and defensive capabilities in large language models.LLM Guard is a security toolkit for LLM interactions that sanitizes inputs, detects harmful language, helps prevent data leakage, and resists prompt injection attacks.

Plans

CyberSecEval

  • CyberSecEval 4Free

CyberSecEval pricing →

LLM Guard

  • LLM GuardFree

LLM Guard pricing →

In their own words

CyberSecEval

CyberSecEval 4 is a benchmark suite for assessing cybersecurity vulnerabilities and defensive capabilities in large language models. Its tests measure model responses to cyberattack requests and whether borderline benign requests are incorrectly refused. Secure-code checks look for insecure suggestions in both instruction and autocomplete settings. Prompt-injection tests cover textual, multilingual textual, and visual attacks; a judge LLM evaluates whether injected instructions succeeded. The code-interpreter benchmark evaluates compliance with malicious prompts and sorts judged responses into three categories: extremely malicious, potentially malicious, or non-malicious. AutoPatchBench measures patch-generation agents on fuzzed C and C++ vulnerabilities, while CyberSOCEval, developed with CrowdStrike, covers malware analysis and threat-intelligence reasoning. The guide lists API support for OpenAI, Anyscale, and Together, and explains adding custom providers for self-hosted models. Setup uses a Python virtual environment, installed requirements, and a Python command-line module. The suite is free under the MIT license for research and commercial use. AutoPatch needs substantial resources: the page recommends at least 80 CPUs and 8 TB of storage.

Visit meta-llama.github.io

LLM Guard

LLM Guard is a self-hosted security toolkit for checking interactions with large language models. It scans prompts and outputs for concerns such as prompt injection, secrets, personally identifiable information, toxicity, bias, malicious URLs, and factual consistency. It can sanitize interactions, detect harmful language, help prevent data leakage, and resist prompt injection attacks. The documentation includes examples for the OpenAI SDK, LangChain, LiteLLM, and LlamaIndex. In the OpenAI examples, prompts and responses are scanned; a streaming example also checks response chunks. LLM Guard can run as an API, and custom scanners can be added. Installation uses `pip install llm-guard` and requires Python 3.9 or higher. It is free and listed under the MIT License, with API, Linux, and self-hosted platforms. The repository was archived on July 9, 2026, is read-only, and is no longer actively developed or maintained. Production deployment assistance is directed to GitHub issues, Slack, and [email protected].

Visit github.com