Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

Dipole LAMA Middleware vs OpenRFID Middleware

Dipole LAMA Middleware

dipolerfid.com

OpenRFID Middleware

github.com

Side by side

FigureDipole LAMA MiddlewareOpenRFID Middleware
Price from—Free
Free plan—Yes
Free trial——
Open source——
WebYesYes
WindowsYesYes
Linux—Yes
API—Yes
Self-hosted—Yes
Plans published11
Spec score · RFID Software7.4 (#13)8.5 (#2)
HeadquartersSant Cugat, Barcelona, SpainNoida, Uttar Pradesh, India
PurposeLAMA Middleware captures and manages data from RFID, NFC, barcodes, and other technologies for real-time tracking.OpenRFID Middleware bridges physical RFID readers with cloud and on-premise applications.
SecurityThe datasheet characterizes its integration methods as structured, maintainable, and secure; it does not name a security certification.The README mentions support for custom authorization tokens and static keys in HTTP headers; it does not state a security certification.

Plans

Dipole LAMA Middleware

  • LAMA MiddlewarePriced on request

Dipole LAMA Middleware pricing →

OpenRFID Middleware

  • OpenRFID MiddlewareFree

OpenRFID Middleware pricing →

In their own words

Dipole LAMA Middleware

Dipole LAMA Middleware has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

Visit dipolerfid.com

OpenRFID Middleware

OpenRFID Middleware connects physical RFID readers with cloud and on-premise applications such as ERPs, WMS and cloud APIs. The free, MIT-licensed project lists reader plugins and protocols including LLRP, Impinj Octane, Zebra FX, Identium, Alien, TCP/UDP sockets, serial connections and MQTT. Filtering options include deduplication, RSSI thresholds, antenna masking and EPC pattern rules. It dispatches data using HTTP GET, POST, PUT or PATCH, with configurable headers and Liquid or Handlebars templates for JSON, form-data, XML and CSV payloads. A persistent SQLite WAL queue retains tag data through network outages for retransmission when connectivity returns; the guide also describes automatic reader reconnection and exponential backoff. Monitoring includes a web dashboard, live tag telemetry, diagnostics, WebSocket logs and an OpenAPI/Swagger REST management API. Deployment documentation covers the .NET CLI and optional Docker Compose. The listed prerequisite is a .NET 10.0 SDK or compatible .NET 8.0+ build target. The repository page shows no releases or packages.

Visit github.com