Dradis vs PenPeeper

Dradis supports security assessment work from kickoff through collaboration, reporting, remediation and workflow automation. It organizes assessment information with structured data, templates and automation to create consistent deliverables, and its review process lets teams examine work in a PR-style format before it reaches a report. Risk tools include CVSSv4, DREAD and MITRE ATT&CK calculators, with OWASP, PTES, OSCP, HIPAA, PCI and custom methodologies. Dradis lists more than 47 integrations across scanners, ticketing and SSO, including Nessus, Burp Suite, Nmap, Qualys, Jira and Okta. A REST API, webhooks and rules engine support integrations and automated workflows. Remediate adds tracking of fixes and integrations with Jira, Azure DevOps and ServiceNow. The software is self-hosted and can run without an internet connection; the maker says it cannot access customer data. Community Edition is free for one project at a time. Assess costs $3,600 a year and Remediate costs $7,200 a year, each with a three-seat minimum.

PenPeeper is an open-source penetration-testing engagement manager for security professionals. It organizes projects through Gather, Search, Findings, and Report stages, supporting multiple engagements and clients, device tags, asset filters, and targeted reports. Users can import scans, screenshots, and notes, then export complete projects as encrypted files for sharing or backup. Built-in automation integrates Nmap, Nikto, SearchSploit, WhatWeb, Enum4Linux, FFUF, and SNMP, with configurable scan concurrency. PenPeeper retrieves CVE details, severity scores, and descriptions from the National Vulnerability Database. AI features cover vulnerability hunting, evidence examination, remediation recommendations, and executive-summary generation through local or cloud providers including LM Studio, Ollama, OpenRouter, Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, and custom providers. Guided templates and customizable summary graphics support PDF reports. The software is free for personal or professional use under its stated license terms, but selling it or hosting it as paid SaaS requires permission or is prohibited. It runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows; Windows requires Windows Subsystem for Linux. Vulnerability testing is passive and flags potential issues for manual review.