e2guardian vs Echo.Cloud.Filter
e2guardian
github.comEcho.Cloud.Filter
pearlsoftware.comSide by side
| Figure | e2guardian | Echo.Cloud.Filter |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | $0.42/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | — | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | — | Yes |
| Android | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Spec score · Internet Filtering Software | 8.5 (#12) | 8.0 (#22) |
| Deployment | The project recommends Linux and says features are limited on FreeBSD while other ports are untested. | Users’ DNS lookups can be directed to Echo.Cloud.Filter by changing DHCP server settings, with no additional software or hardware required. |
| Purpose | E2guardian is a web content filtering proxy that can run in explicit proxy, transparent proxy, or ICAP server mode. | Echo.Cloud.Filter provides hosted web filtering for an organization’s network and guest users. |
| Support | The README directs users to a community forum and GitHub issues for bugs and feature requests. | Pearl’s Knowledge Base provides answers to known issues and common configuration problems, and users can email its technical support team about an issue. |
Plans
Echo.Cloud.Filter
- Echo.Cloud.Filter$5 a year
- DNS server and management portal setup$399, paid once
In their own words
Echo.Cloud.Filter
Echo.Cloud.Filter has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.