EclEmma vs NCover
| EclEmma | NCover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Coverage types | instruction, branch, line, method, type, cyclomatic complexity | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity |
| Supported languages | Java, Scala | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, CSV, JaCoCo execution data (.exec) | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Specifiction, EclEmma scores higher on our published basis.