Education Walkthrough vs EduEval
Education Walkthrough
educationwalkthrough.comEduEval
schoolsolutions.appSide by side
| Figure | Education Walkthrough | EduEval |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $16.67/mo | $24.17/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | Yes | Yes |
| Android | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 4 | 4 |
| Spec score · Teacher Evaluation Software | 8.5 (#5) | 9.1 (#2) |
| Analytics | The platform provides school-wide analytics to visualize observation data and identify growth areas and trends. | Automated dashboards surface instructional trends across a school. |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Rhode Island |
| Integrations | The maker says it supports OneRoster v1.1 roster sync with ClassLink and Clever, Google Single Sign-On, and Google Drive report storage. | The opened maker pages describe email sharing and PDF attachments but do not name external software integrations. |
| Purpose | Education Walkthrough is classroom walkthrough software for instructional leaders to observe classrooms, provide feedback, and analyze observation data. | EduEval helps K–12 principals turn classroom observation notes into rubric-aligned teacher evaluation feedback. |
| Security | The maker describes its architecture as FERPA-first and says it offers role-based access control and data export via CSV or Google Drive. | The vendor states that records are encrypted in transit and at rest, with role-limited access and audit logging. |
| Support | The maker offers live support chat and email, a 24/7 help center, onboarding, and customized professional learning. | The maker says onboarding support is available and offers a 15-minute walkthrough by contacting [email protected]. |
Plans
Education Walkthrough
- BasicFree
- Individual$200 a year
- School$400 a year
- DistrictPriced on request
In their own words
Education Walkthrough
Education Walkthrough is classroom walkthrough software for instructional leaders to observe classrooms, provide feedback, and review observation data. Users can start with a Danielson Framework-based 10-minute template, browse a template library, or create standards-aligned tools in the template editor. Walkthroughs can include photo or video evidence and saved drafts; customized PDF reports can include a digital signature and school logo. Work saved locally syncs automatically when a device reconnects. School-wide analytics help visualize observations and identify growth areas and trends. Integrations include OneRoster v1.1 roster sync with ClassLink and Clever, Google Single Sign-On, and Google Drive report storage. The maker describes its architecture as FERPA-first and lists role-based access control and data export via CSV or Google Drive. A free Basic plan covers one school, five teachers, and 10 walkthroughs per month, without analytics or collaboration. Individual costs $200.00 per year per user; School costs $400.00 per year per user. The School Teams trial lasts 14 days, with up to 25 people able to join without being billed during the trial.
EduEval
EduEval helps K–12 principals turn classroom observation notes into rubric-aligned teacher evaluation feedback. It supports Danielson, Marzano, and custom district rubrics, with configurable domains, indicators, and performance levels. Its AI workflow organizes notes, aligns them with a rubric, and drafts feedback for an evaluator to review and edit before release. Administrators can take notes on a tablet or smartphone, with automatic syncing to the desktop dashboard. Reports can be shared by email with PDF attachments, and threaded comments support coaching conversations. The product is described for informal walkthroughs and formal summative evaluations. The free plan allows one administrator, one staff member, and five observations per month. Individual costs $290 a year and supports one administrator and up to 15 staff; School and Large School add school-wide analytics and audit logs. The maker says records are encrypted, access is role-limited and audit-logged, and data is not sold. Notes are sent to the AI provider to draft feedback, so the maker advises leaving student names out.