Elicit vs ResearchRabbit

Elicit is an AI research assistant for researchers gathering and assessing evidence. Its Research Agent draws on scientific databases, academic journals, public data sources, uploaded documents, a corpus of 138 million academic papers, and the wider web. A session can use up to 20 uploaded resources, including PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, and JPG files. Elicit offers Research Agent sessions, Research Reports, and Systematic Reviews, and supports AI-generated claims with sentence-level citations to underlying sources. It can find up to 1,000 relevant papers and analyze up to 20,000 data points at once. Research Reports export as PDF or Word, tables as CSV or Excel, and references as RIS or BIB. Elicit runs on the web and provides an API, but API access requires Pro or above. Its MCP server connects to Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and other compatible clients using OAuth 2.0. Basic is free with limited usage for Research Agent and Research Reports; Plus costs $11 a month. Pro is $39 a month and Scale is $89 a month. Elicit states that it has achieved SOC 2 Type II compliance.

ResearchRabbit is a web service for discovering research related to papers users select. It analyzes those papers and recommends connected work, with interactive maps showing links among papers, authors and concepts. Its recommendations adapt to reading patterns and research interests. The Free plan costs nothing and provides unlimited searches across more than 310 million articles, an unlimited library and collections, sharing, core search settings and up to 50 seed articles. ResearchRabbit+ raises the seed limit to 300 and adds advanced search controls, multiple projects, Signals alerts and faster support responses. Its annual plan costs $10 a year (billed per month, Annual plan); the monthly plan costs $12.50 a month (billed per month, Monthly plan). Users can import selected articles from Zotero collections and export articles as BibTeX. ResearchRabbit is aimed at researchers and students, and does not provide screening workflows, full-text management or systematic review tools.