Skip to content
SPECIFICTION
Get listed

Expertiza vs PeerEvals

Expertiza

expertiza.ncsu.edu

PeerEvals

peerevals.app

Side by side

FigureExpertizaPeerEvals
Price from—Free
Free plan—Yes
Free trial——
Open source——
WebYesYes
macOSYes—
LinuxYes—
Self-hostedYes—
Plans published01
Spec score · Peer Assessment Software7.9 (#6)7.2 (#9)
PurposeExpertiza is software for creating reusable learning objects through peer review and supports team projects.A third-party product listing describes PeerEvals as a free web-based peer assessment platform for educators managing group projects and team-based learning.

Plans

Expertiza

No plans published.

Expertiza pricing →

PeerEvals

  • FreeFree

PeerEvals pricing →

In their own words

Expertiza

Expertiza is a free, open-source web application for instructors to deploy assignments and students to submit and peer-review learning objects. Submissions can include articles, code, websites, URLs, and wiki pages; students can also form teams and sign up for topics. The system supports rubric scoring, moderation, one-way reviewer anonymity, and manual review allocation. The project says it is used in select NC State courses and by professors at several other colleges and universities. It can be run locally or deployed to production, with development setup guides for Ubuntu/Debian, macOS, and Linux RHEL. Developers need a JVM. A documented Moodle LTI integration allows assignments to launch from Moodle and sends grades to its gradebook, but setup requires a Moodle administrator to register and activate Expertiza as an external tool provider. The project also describes a generic synchronization interface intended for LMS platforms such as Blackboard or Canvas. The repository lists an MIT license and points to instructor and student manuals, presentations, and videos.

Visit expertiza.ncsu.edu

PeerEvals

PeerEvals is a free web-based peer assessment platform for educators running group projects and team-based learning. Instructors can define rubric criteria and organize evaluations into multiple phases, with deadlines and timezone support for each phase. Dashboards and heat maps show progress, while reports and data exports support review of results. CSV imports handle student and group data, and role-based access separates student, teacher, and administrator workflows. The listing identifies rubric scoring and says a paid tier is not required for the core job. Instructor account requests are reviewed by an administrator. Students do not register through that page; instructors add them to the class. PeerEvals does not include AI-assisted evaluation features, so the listed workflow centers on rubrics, phased evaluations, progress tracking, and reporting. It is accessed on the web. These account and workflow details matter when planning how a class will be set up and who will initiate participation.

Visit peerevals.app