Fn Project vs OpenFunction
Fn Project
fnproject.ioOpenFunction
openfunction.devSide by side
| Figure | Fn Project | OpenFunction |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 0 |
| Spec score · Serverless Platforms | 7.9 (#9) | 6.8 (#19) |
| Integrations | Fn can run with Docker, Podman, or Rancher Desktop; its docs also list a Kubernetes Helm chart. | Its BaaS integration uses Dapr and currently supports the pub/sub and bindings building blocks. |
| License | The Fn documentation repository identifies its license as Apache-2.0. | OpenFunction is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. |
| Requirements | The installation tutorial lists Linux, macOS, or Windows and requires Docker 17.10 or later, Podman 5.7.0 or later, or Rancher Desktop 1.22.0 or later. | The installation guide lists Kubernetes version >=v1.21.0-0 and Helm version >=v3.6.3 as requirements. |
| What it does | Fn is an open-source, event-driven Functions-as-a-Service compute platform. | OpenFunction is a cloud-native, open-source Function as a Service platform for running functions without managing their underlying runtime environment and infrastructure. |
Plans
In their own words
Fn Project
Fn Project has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
OpenFunction
OpenFunction has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.