Forgejo Actions vs GitBucket
Forgejo Actions
forgejo.org
GitBucket
gitbucket.github.ioSide by side
| Figure | Forgejo Actions | GitBucket |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Spec score · Source Code Management | 8.2 (#12) | 8.1 (#16) |
| Spec score · Repository Management Software | 8.1 (#13) | 8.0 (#16) |
| Spec score · Git Platforms | 8.0 (#13) | 8.0 (#14) |
| Integrations | Actions can use actions hosted on Forgejo, including actions served from a configurable default actions URL. | The project documentation points to integration guidance for Jenkins and Slack. |
| Purpose | Forgejo Actions provides continuous integration driven by workflow files in a repository’s `.forgejo/workflows` directory. | GitBucket is a Git web platform powered by Scala, designed for easy installation, extensibility, and GitHub API compatibility. |
Plans
In their own words
Forgejo Actions
Forgejo Actions has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
GitBucket
GitBucket has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.