GaraTrust vs Sigstore
GaraTrust
garantir.io
Sigstore
sigstore.devSide by side
| Figure | GaraTrust | Sigstore |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | Free |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | Yes |
| Web | — | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Linux | — | Yes |
| API | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Spec score · Code Signing Software | 7.1 (#23) | 8.3 (#7) |
| Support | Every subscription includes 24/7/365 enterprise-grade support for production environments. | Community support is provided through Slack and GitHub issues, with repository CODEOWNERS identifying project maintainers. |
| What it does | GaraTrust provides enterprise code signing for binaries, containers, drivers, and packages using HSM-backed signing. | Sigstore helps developers sign and verify release files, container images, binaries and SBOMs to improve software supply-chain security. |
Plans
In their own words
Sigstore
Sigstore is a free, open source project for signing and verifying software artifacts to improve supply chain security. It supports release files, container images, binaries, software bills of materials, and more. Signatures use temporary keys, so developers do not have to manage signing keys; events are recorded in a tamper-resistant public log for audit. Its components include Cosign, Fulcio, Rekor, OpenID Connect, and Policy Controller. Cosign signs and verifies artifacts and stores signatures in an OCI registry. Fulcio issues temporary certificates to authorized identities, while Rekor keeps signed metadata in a searchable ledger. OpenID Connect authenticates users through providers such as GitHub and Google. The trust root uses The Update Framework and is maintained by five keyholders from different companies and academic institutions. Sigstore provides GitHub Actions, documents GitLab CI installation, and offers official clients for Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Rust. It supports API, Linux, macOS, Windows, and self-hosted environments. One integration caveat is that Cosign has no API stability guarantees, does not follow semantic versioning, and is not recommended for application integration because of its dependencies.