GitBucket vs Gogs
GitBucket
gitbucket.github.ioGogs
gogs.ioSide by side
| Figure | GitBucket | Gogs |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Spec score · Source Code Management | 8.1 (#16) | 8.7 (#6) |
| Spec score · Git Hosting Services | 8.0 (#19) | 8.5 (#4) |
| Spec score · Git Platforms | 8.0 (#14) | 8.6 (#5) |
| Spec score · Repository Management Software | 8.0 (#16) | 8.6 (#6) |
| Installation | GitBucket requires Java 17 and can run as a WAR file or be deployed to a Servlet 3.0 container such as Jetty, Tomcat, or JBoss. | Gogs can be installed using a pre-built binary or Docker; its site also lists third-party packages. |
| License | GitBucket is open source under the Apache License 2.0. | Gogs says it has been MIT-licensed since 2014, with its source code publicly available. |
| Purpose | GitBucket is a Git web platform powered by Scala, designed for easy installation, extensibility, and GitHub API compatibility. | Gogs is a simple, stable, extensible self-hosted Git service. |
Plans
In their own words
GitBucket
GitBucket has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.