GitHub CodeQL vs OpenText Fortify SAST
GitHub CodeQL
codeql.github.comOpenText Fortify SAST
opentext.comSide by side
| Figure | GitHub CodeQL | OpenText Fortify SAST |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $30/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 5 | 0 |
| Spec score · Ruby Static Analysis Tools | 8.5 (#2) | 6.1 (#11) |
| Spec score · Static Application Security Testing Sast | 8.5 (#4) | 5.8 (#20) |
| Spec score · SAST Tools | 8.5 (#5) | 5.8 (#24) |
| Spec score · Static Analysis Tools | 8.5 (#8) | 5.9 (#32) |
Plans
GitHub CodeQL
- Free for research and open sourceFree
- GitHub Code Security$30 a month
- CodeQL for open source and researchFree
- GitHub Code Security$30 a month
- GitHub Free with CodeQL code scanningPrice not published
In their own words
GitHub CodeQL
GitHub CodeQL has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
OpenText Fortify SAST
OpenText Fortify SAST has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.