HASH vs Ontotext Platform
| HASH | Ontotext Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $1.67/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, extension, self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 20 /mo | — |
| Ontology modeling | Yes | Yes |
| Semantic reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Graph visualization | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | both | self_hosted |
| Query languages | natural language | GraphQL, SPARQL |
| RDF/SPARQL support | — | Yes |
| Import formats | — | csv, tsv, excel, json, xml |
Both are listed in Best Knowledge Graph Software. On Specifiction, HASH scores higher on our published basis.