Intave vs MLSAC
| Intave | MLSAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | €79/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | self-hosted, Web | Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Server platforms | Spigot | Paper, Spigot, Folia, kSpigot, Purpur |
| Minecraft versions | 1.8 through 26.3 | — |
| Detection coverage | Reach, hitbox, fastbreak, click automation, click-speed anomalies, combat automation, interaction cheats, inventory-related cheats, movement cheats, placement automation, protocol inconsistencies, game-speed changes | Camera-movement anomalies; behavioral anomalies; chat activity |
| Enforcement actions | Notifications, movement setbacks/corrections, kick, temporary ban, permanent ban, custom proxy commands, inventory closing, item-use reset, packet stopping or delay | Alerts; kick; ban; damage reduction |
| Replay analysis | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Minecraft Anti-Cheat Plugins. On Specifiction, Intave scores higher on our published basis.