MicroShift vs Talos Linux
| MicroShift | Talos Linux | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | $83.33/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Supported operating systems | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.8 | Linux, macOS, and Windows for talosctl; Talos Linux runs on Linux-based infrastructure |
| Multi-node clusters | No | Yes |
| Graphical interface | No | — |
| Container runtime options | CRI-O | containerd |
| Kubernetes version control | Version is tied to the MicroShift release; MicroShift 4.22 is derived from OpenShift Container Platform 4.22 | Configured by selecting Kubernetes component image versions in machine configuration |
| Local registry support | Yes | Yes |
| Add-on catalog | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Local Kubernetes Tools. On Specifiction, Talos Linux scores higher on our published basis.