Oversecured vs Q-mast

Oversecured is an offensive security platform for mobile apps that combines static, dynamic, and interactive application testing with AI-assisted triage. Android static analysis can use APK, AAB, or APKS files without Android source code; iOS static analysis requires Swift source code. The site says it covers more than 175 Android and 85 iOS vulnerability types. Dynamic testing runs apps in a controlled environment, fuzzes deep links and exported components, and provides proofs of concept, stack traces, recordings, and reproduction steps. Interactive testing can use a configured test account to examine protected flows such as payments, account settings, and private content. Integrations include CLI, MCP, REST API, CI/CD, and webhooks, while role-based access and SSO for Microsoft Entra ID and Google Workspace are available. Hacker costs $500, paid once, billed per scan; Business costs $1,000 a month, billed per app. Enterprise pricing is custom and includes on-prem deployment and regional hosting. A limited five-week pilot is offered free with no commitment.

Q-mast is an automated security testing solution for iOS and Android applications. It analyzes compiled binaries without source code, including obfuscated, protected, and signed builds. Static, dynamic, interactive, and forced-path execution methods are combined, with behavior observed on non-rooted and non-jailbroken devices. Quokka says scans take less than 60 minutes and report less than 1% false results. Q-mast creates version-precise software bills of materials and examines SDK behavior, vulnerable dependencies, and risky third-party code. Checks cover NIAP, NIST, OWASP MASVS, CVEs, and SARIF. Listed connections include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Appium, and Snyk, with API support for CI/CD and DevSecOps integration. Quokka positions it for developers adding security testing to the software development lifecycle. Pricing is on request, and a personalized demo is available. Quokka states that Q-mast is SOC 2 compliant.