Peerceptiv vs PeerEvals
Peerceptiv
peerceptiv.comPeerEvals
peerevals.appSide by side
| Figure | Peerceptiv | PeerEvals |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | Free |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Spec score · Peer Assessment Software | 7.1 (#11) | 7.2 (#9) |
Plans
Peerceptiv
- Campus-wide subscriptionsPriced on request
- Faculty & Department LicensesPriced on request
- Student & Bookstore PurchasePriced on request
- Workforce Development & Special ApplicationsPriced on request
In their own words
Peerceptiv
Peerceptiv is a peer learning platform for higher education, covering peer review, peer assessment, team member evaluation, group formation, and live presentations. It supports assignments involving writing, presentations, video uploads, computer code, and group projects. Live Presentation tools let audiences submit rubric-based reviews while producing real-time data about presentations and reviewers. Team Member Evaluation combines quantitative and qualitative feedback, 360-style reviews, and role-specific rubrics. Group Formation can match participants using calendar availability, instructor priorities, similarity or dissimilarity logic, and customizable surveys. Proprietary research-validated machine learning calculates results and provides personalized performance feedback. Integrations include Canvas, Blackboard, D2L Brightspace, and Moodle with automatic roster syncing. Campus subscriptions add LTI, single sign-on, student auto-population, and grade passback. Instructors can create a free account. Paid options include campus, student, faculty, department, workforce, and special-application arrangements, with pricing available on request. Peerceptiv states SOC 2 Type II compliance and support responses within 24 hours.
PeerEvals
PeerEvals is a free web-based peer assessment platform for educators running group projects and team-based learning. Instructors can define rubric criteria and organize evaluations into multiple phases, with deadlines and timezone support for each phase. Dashboards and heat maps show progress, while reports and data exports support review of results. CSV imports handle student and group data, and role-based access separates student, teacher, and administrator workflows. The listing identifies rubric scoring and says a paid tier is not required for the core job. Instructor account requests are reviewed by an administrator. Students do not register through that page; instructors add them to the class. PeerEvals does not include AI-assisted evaluation features, so the listed workflow centers on rubrics, phased evaluations, progress tracking, and reporting. It is accessed on the web. These account and workflow details matter when planning how a class will be set up and who will initiate participation.