Pinport vs Reminiscence
Pinport
pinport.appReminiscence
github.comSide by side
| Figure | Pinport | Reminiscence |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $6.58/mo | Free |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | — | Yes |
| iOS | Yes | — |
| Android | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | — | Yes |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Spec score · Bookmark Managers | 8.0 (#16) | 8.3 (#9) |
| Integrations | Pinport offers an API and webhooks, and automation tools such as Zapier or n8n can connect through generic HTTP and webhook steps; there is no native connector or prebuilt template. | Media archiving uses configurable third-party download managers; curl and wget are listed as defaults, and youtube-dl is given as an option. |
| Purpose | Pinport is a personal bookmark manager for saving, organizing, and finding links. | Reminiscence is a self-hosted bookmark and archive manager described as a hybrid of a bookmark manager and a personal wayback machine. |
| Security | The privacy policy says data is encrypted in transit using HTTPS and at rest through Google Cloud encryption mechanisms, with access limited to authorized people who need it. | The reader removes JavaScript from the original archived format for security reasons, and the README advises migrating from versions using wkhtmltopdf because of a security vulnerability. |
Plans
In their own words
Reminiscence
Reminiscence has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.