PlagiarismSearch vs Plagium

PlagiarismSearch checks submitted writing against selected web, archived, publication, academic, and enabled organizational sources. Its reports identify matching or similar passages, link those passages to detected sources, and provide a similarity report. An AI writing feature gives probability indicators for the full text and individual passages, highlighting passages for review. The service also lists paper analysis, readability, and spelling and grammar tools. Users can check up to 150 words for free, while registered users can check up to 300 words daily at no charge. The maker says its academic database contains over 500 million indexed texts. Integrations include a Moodle plugin, Google Docs add-on, customizable API, and Viber and Telegram bots. The maker presents it for students, educators, writers, bloggers, universities, and organizations. Paid options include a Light one-time package at $9.95, paid once and monthly packages from $27.95 a month. The maker says uploaded documents are not stored, though reports may remain in an account until deleted by the user.

Plagium analyzes text for similarity with other material and offers a separate tool for identifying patterns compatible with AI-generated writing. Its plagiarism service compares submitted text with an online database and reports similarities with links to original sources. The AI Detector uses statistical and probabilistic analysis of writing patterns. Deep Search accepts Microsoft Word, PDF, and native text files; Google Drive integration and a Google Docs add-on support document analysis. Institutional users can access an API, while business solutions can integrate with corporate CRM, ERP, and document-management systems. Plagium presents solutions for educational institutions, publishers, editors, companies, researchers, and compliance teams. The free account costs nothing and allows five daily searches with a 4,000-character limit, but excludes Deep Search and API access. Plagium says submitted content remains owned by the user and is processed for analysis, report generation, and service improvement. Reports are automated estimates rather than definitive proof, and private, unpublished, or non-indexed material may not be detected.