Raccoon vs SnowcatCloud
Raccoon
raystack.github.io
SnowcatCloud
snowcatcloud.comSide by side
| Figure | Raccoon | SnowcatCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | Free |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | — | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | — | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | — | Yes |
| Linux | — | Yes |
| iOS | — | Yes |
| Android | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 0 | 4 |
| Spec score · Event Tracking Software | 6.8 (#21) | 7.8 (#11) |
| Deployment | Raccoon can be deployed using its Docker image or on Kubernetes, and the deployment guide says a Helm chart is available. | The pipeline is offered cloud-hosted, as a managed service in a customer's cloud, as BYOC, or self-hosted as open source. |
| Security | Raccoon does not provide HTTPS or authentication itself; its deployment guide recommends terminating SSL at an API gateway and handling authentication with a separate service. | SnowcatCloud states that it is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and encrypts data in transit and at rest. |
Plans
SnowcatCloud
- OpenSnowcat Open-SourceFree
- Cloud-HostedPriced on request
- Effortless DeploymentPriced on request
- Managed ServicePriced on request
In their own words
Raccoon
Raccoon has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
SnowcatCloud
SnowcatCloud has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.