ReviewAid vs ReviQ
ReviewAid
reviewaid.github.ioReviQ
github.comSide by side
| Figure | ReviewAid | ReviQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 0 |
| Spec score · Systematic Review Software | 8.3 (#5) | 6.7 (#28) |
| Intended users | The maker says ReviewAid was built to assist researchers, especially those involved in evidence synthesis. | The project describes its workflow for researchers conducting systematic or multivocal literature reviews, including reviews with up to five reviewers. |
| License | ReviewAid is licensed under Apache 2.0. | The repository lists the GNU General Public License v3. |
| Purpose | ReviewAid is an open-source AI tool for full-text screening and data extraction in systematic reviews. | ReviQ is a locally deployed workbench for systematic and multivocal literature reviews. |
Plans
In their own words
ReviewAid
ReviewAid is a free, open-source AI tool for full-text screening and data extraction in systematic reviews. Researchers can provide PICO inclusion and exclusion criteria for classifying papers, then define which fields they want extracted. The tool reports confidence scores and marks low-confidence results for manual review. Downloads are available as CSV, XLSX, or DOCX. ReviewAid supports OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Cohere, Z.ai, and local Ollama. When a cloud provider is selected, paper text is sent to that provider for the run; with Ollama, inference takes place on the local machine and the text remains there. The maker says API keys are not stored. Users can work in a browser-based Streamlit app or install locally with Python 3.12 or later and Streamlit on Windows, macOS, or Linux. Hosted sessions may take about 30 seconds to initialize. Submission guidance caps full-text screening at 10 articles and extraction at 20 per submission. ReviewAid is licensed under Apache 2.0 and is described as a supplementary reviewer, not a substitute for manual screening or extraction.