Scala.js vs SWC

Scala.js is a Scala-to-JavaScript compiler for building applications that run in browsers, Node.js, and serverless environments. The project also states that WebAssembly support is stable. Scala's strong typing can catch mistakes such as mixing strings and numbers or using misspelled method names, while editor support can flag type errors and show inline details about methods, arguments, return types, and documentation. The project describes incremental compilation with a 1–2 second turnaround; generated JavaScript for a full application starts at 45 kB gzipped. Scala.js can use JavaScript libraries and APIs through statically or dynamically typed access. Listed library integrations include React, Angular, Vue, Three.js, and Chart.js. Build tool options include sbt, scala-cli, Mill, and Gradle with a Scala.js plugin. Tutorials list Scala development tools and Node.js as prerequisites and recommend VS Code with Metals. Scala.js is free and distributed under the Apache License 2.0. Documentation points users to community support through Discord and Stack Overflow. The 1.22.0 release is not entirely backward source compatible with 1.21.x.

SWC is a free, extensible Rust-based platform for tools that compile and bundle JavaScript and TypeScript. It transforms modern JavaScript and TypeScript into code intended for major browsers, and supports minification, WebAssembly transforms, and custom plugins. Its core API parses ECMAScript, TypeScript, and Flow syntax; the documentation describes that API as mainly useful to build-tool authors. Integrations include webpack, Rspack, and Jest, while Next.js, Parcel, and Deno are among the tools named as users. A WebAssembly module can transform code synchronously inside a browser. SWC can be installed as prebuilt binaries or built from source, with packages documented for npm, Yarn, pnpm, Bun, and Deno. The site states that it is 20x faster than Babel on one thread and 70x faster on four cores. The bundling documentation says that feature will be dropped in v2 and recommends SWC-based bundlers instead. It also warns that its polyfill usage mode is less efficient than Babel for certain dynamically computed property expressions.