Scholarcy vs Systematicly

Scholarcy turns research material into interactive summary flashcards that highlight key information and provide context. It accepts research papers, PDFs, book chapters, online articles, plain text and YouTube videos. Users can add content by uploading or dropping files, entering a webpage URL, pasting text or using a browser extension. Enhanced summaries can be tailored to reading styles such as School level, General reader, Bulleted list, Undergrad level, One liner and Researcher. Research tools include cited-work findings, article prompts and questions, a Research Quality Indicator and comparisons with related research. Scholarcy imports directly from Zotero and exports referenced summaries to Markdown for tools including Roam, Obsidian and Notion. Extensions are offered for Chrome, Edge and Firefox; Safari is listed as coming soon. The free plan costs nothing and allows 10 summaries, with flashcards exported one at a time. Scanned PDFs without extractable text are unsupported unless OCR is run first, and URLs behind paywalls may not import. Scholarcy says customer data is encrypted at rest and in transit.

Systematicly is a web-based research platform for systematic reviews, primary research, ethics applications and research proposals. It can analyze a topic using PICO, PECO or SPIDER frameworks and produce Boolean searches for databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC and PsycINFO. Reviewers can screen titles and abstracts and upload PDFs for structured field extraction. Analysis options include 1,033 statistical functions, plain-English analysis, meta-analysis, plots, sensitivity analysis and GRADE assessment. The platform lists eight review types, plus publishing tools such as AI-assisted manuscripts and proposals, PRISMA diagrams, journal recommendations and reviewer response letters. It retrieves PDFs automatically from PMC, Unpaywall and EuropePMC, and supports ClinicalTrials.gov imports and several reference formats. The free Explorer plan is limited to three active personal drafts, one lifetime feasibility preview and three lifetime Evidence Answers. Paid one-time options include a single Evidence Answer for $19, paid once and literature review packages from $149, paid once. The security page says user data is not used to train AI models; Anthropic’s commercial API may retain inputs and outputs for up to 30 days for trust and safety monitoring.