ScreenWeaver vs Scriptuber
ScreenWeaver
screenweaver.aiScriptuber
scriptuber.comSide by side
| Figure | ScreenWeaver | Scriptuber |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $9.99/mo | $19/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | — |
| iOS | Yes | Yes |
| Android | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 5 | 2 |
| Spec score · AI Script Writing Software | 8.9 (#4) | 7.7 (#14) |
| What it does | ScreenWeaver connects screenplay writing, shot breakdown, storyboarding and AI video production in one workflow. | Scriptuber drafts YouTube scripts in the creator’s voice using a proven video’s format and the creator’s private notes. |
Plans
ScreenWeaver
- ScreenwriterFree
- Storyboard Beta$9.99 a month
- Auteur$39.99 a month
- Studio$149.99 a month
- FilmmakerPriced on request
In their own words
ScreenWeaver
ScreenWeaver has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.
Scriptuber
Scriptuber is a writing tool for YouTube creators who draft their own scripts. It uses private notes and the format of a source video to help draft in the creator’s voice. Its Pro writer can produce a YouTube script or blog article, and a separate Writing Assistant revises a passage selected by the user. Creators can pull transcripts and text from YouTube videos, web articles, and X posts; TikTok and Instagram pulls are disabled. Format extraction turns a source video’s elements into a reusable template, while competitor discovery flags videos that exceed selected channels’ own view-count baselines. Pro also includes voice-note transcription, draft dictation, and a remote MCP connector with 14 tools for sources, notes, competitor discovery, and drafts. The service is desktop-first, with a trimmed mobile experience for capturing ideas, and runs on web, Android, and iOS. The free plan includes note capture, AI cleanup, a private creator corpus, and a FlowMind canvas. Pro costs $19.00 per month or $190 per year. Scriptuber has no publishing features, so users copy reviewed drafts into their own workflow.