AI Tools
Best AI Literature Review Software in 2026
AI literature review software supports work such as screening papers, analyzing full text and organizing evidence for a review. Compare AI paper summaries and full-text analysis with the screening workflow and systematic review support.
- 01
ASReview ASReview suits screeners, information specialists, students, and research teams handling systematic reviews.
Free plan Open source Web · Windows · macOS · Linux9.0 Visit Specs - 02 LASER AI From $250/mo Free trial Web · iOS · Android8.8 Visit Specs
- 03 LitKernel From $9/mo Free plan Web8.6 Visit Specs
- 04
Moara Moara is aimed at academics, graduate students, librarians, research administrators, individual researchers, and library teams.
From $15/mo Free plan Web · API8.6 Visit Specs - 05 Scholarcy
Scholarcy is aimed at students and researchers handling papers, chapters and collections of research articles.
From $7.50/mo Free plan Web · API · Browser extension8.6 Visit Specs - 06 RobotReviewer
RobotReviewer suits users analyzing clinical trial reports who need PICO extraction, likely-bias assessments, or synthesis across reports.
Free plan Open source Web · Windows · macOS · Linux8.4 Visit Specs - 07 Sysrev From $50/mo Free plan Web · API · Self-hosted8.4 Visit Specs
- 08
Axelium Axelium suits individual researchers and teams conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, including pharma and HEOR groups, CROs, HTA bodies, and guideline committees.
From $29/mo Free plan Web · Browser extension8.3 Visit Specs - 09
Elicit Elicit suits researchers who want to search papers and other sources, review evidence, and export reports, tables, or references.
From $11/mo Free plan Web · API8.2 Visit Specs - 10 Universal SLR Assistant
It is intended for PhD students, researchers, professors, evidence synthesis teams, and authors of systematic or scoping reviews.
Free plan Open source Web · Windows · macOS · Linux8.2 Visit Specs - 11
Rayyan Rayyan suits research teams that need a structured review process covering screening through reporting.
From $4.99/mo Free plan Web · iOS · Android · API8.1 Visit Specs - 12
Abstrackr It suits researchers, librarians, and review teams conducting systematic reviews.
Free plan Web8.0 Visit Specs - 13 Covidence From $28.25/mo Free trial Web8.0 Visit Specs
- 14 EPPI-Reviewer From £10/mo Free trial Web8.0 Visit Specs
- 15
Catchii It suits teams conducting systematic reviews who need importing, deduplication, collaborative screening and final data extraction.
Free plan Web7.9 Visit Specs - 16
DistillerSR From $7.83/mo Web · API7.9 Visit Specs - 17 EasySLR From $250/mo Free trial Web7.9 Visit Specs
- 18 LitFlow
LitFlow suits academic researchers conducting systematic reviews in medicine, software engineering, social sciences, and related fields.
Free plan Web · Self-hosted7.9 Visit Specs - 19
Mapped Research It is designed for medical researchers, including solo clinicians and institution-backed professors, who conduct evidence reviews.
Free plan Web7.9 Visit Specs - 20
Colandr It suits review teams conducting evidence, systematic, or other document syntheses who want machine-assisted screening with human decisions.
Free plan Web7.8 Visit Specs - 21
Evidentum Free plan Web7.7 Visit Specs - 22
Silvi Silvi suits researchers and teams building structured evidence libraries or conducting systematic reviews, meta-analyses or network meta-analyses.
From €19/mo Free plan Web7.7 Visit Specs - 23 Nested Knowledge From $19.95/mo Free trial Web7.6 Visit Specs
- 24
EvidenceGrid AI It suits research teams running systematic literature reviews that need shared screening, extraction, audit trails, and structured exports.
Free plan Web7.5 Visit Specs - 25 ReviewBrewery From $666.67/mo Free trial Web7.5 Visit Specs
Rayyan, Universal SLR Assistant and ASReview are among the options shown. Collaboration seats and export formats can help you assess how findings move among colleagues or into other research workflows. The listed free-plan availability and “Paid from” price offer cost details to consider with those capabilities. Think about the review process you need to carry out, how you plan to share results and which outputs you need to take forward.