UXPin

UXPin is a prototyping and design tool for product teams that need to model interface behavior alongside visual design. Its coded component libraries and collaboration features make it a strong fit for teams with established design and development workflows; the trade-off is that prototype and AI-credit limits vary by plan.

Overview

UXPin lets teams build prototypes with interactions, states, conditional flows, variables, expressions, and dynamic content. Built-in coded libraries such as MUI, Tailwind UI, and Ant Design can help teams work from familiar components rather than starting with static screens.

It also supports design systems, developer handoff, user testing, and real-time collaboration. Prototype sharing allows unlimited viewers and commenters, with public and team comments. Integrations include Slack, FullStory, Jira, Storybook, Git, a Figma plugin, and Sketch import. UXPin Inc., founded in 2010 and headquartered in Gdansk, Poland, offers cloud access alongside desktop and mobile apps.

Key features

Interactive prototyping: Conditional logic, variables, and expressions are included in Core, making that plan capable of representing more than screen-to-screen navigation.

Coded libraries: MUI, Tailwind UI, Ant Design, and other libraries suit teams that want prototypes grounded in coded components.

Review and collaboration: Unlimited viewers and commenters reduce friction when gathering feedback, while public and team comments and real-time collaboration support shared review.

Connected workflows: Jira, Storybook, Git, Slack, FullStory, the Figma plugin, and Sketch import connect UXPin to design and development workflows.

Version history: Core retains seven days of history; Growth extends that to 30 days, while Enterprise includes unlimited history.

Support: Support ranges from a knowledge base to dedicated Slack and an account manager, with email, chat, phone, and documentation among the channels.

Pricing

UXPin has a limited free plan and a 14-day trial. Free provides two prototypes and 50 AI credits, then limited free access after the trial ends. That is enough to explore the product, but the prototype cap makes it a poor fit for sustained work on multiple projects.

Core costs $49 a month when billed monthly, or $29 a month billed yearly, with annual billing saving 40%. Aimed at individuals and small teams, it includes unlimited prototypes, 200 AI credits per month, and seven-day version history. It also includes conditional logic, variables, and expressions. Extra AI credits start at 200 for $13/month.

Growth costs $69 a month billed monthly, or $40 a month billed yearly, also saving 40% annually. It raises the allowance to 500 AI credits per month and extends version history to 30 days. Growth adds roles and permissions, SSO, and 2FA, making it the more suitable paid tier for growing teams that need administration and access controls.

Enterprise has custom pricing for large organizations. It includes unlimited prototypes, custom AI credits, unlimited version history, and a security review. Students enrolled in degree or diploma programs can use UXPin for free after verification.

Platforms

UXPin supports Android, iOS, macOS, web, and Windows. Its apps include UXPin for Mac and Windows, plus Mirror for iOS and Android. Cloud, desktop, and mobile deployment gives teams options across design and review contexts.

Who it's for

UXPin is best suited to solo designers and product teams that want interactive prototypes tied to coded libraries, collaboration, and developer handoff. Core is the practical starting point for individuals and small teams; Growth makes more sense when role management, security features, additional credits, and longer history matter. Teams seeking only a small number of simple prototypes may find the free cap restrictive, while those needing unlimited history or custom credit allowances will need Enterprise.

Pros and cons

Pro: Conditional logic, variables, and expressions are part of Core, so meaningful interactive behavior does not require the Growth tier.

Pro: Unlimited viewers and commenters support broad review without a stated audience cap.

Pro: Coded libraries and integrations with tools such as Storybook, Git, and Jira support teams working across design and development.

Con: The free plan is limited to two prototypes and 50 AI credits, restricting ongoing project work.

Con: Core and Growth have finite monthly AI-credit allowances and short version-history windows; teams needing more credits or longer retention must pay more or consider Enterprise.

Con: SSO, 2FA, and roles and permissions are reserved for Growth, so Core is less suited to teams that need those administrative controls.

Alternatives

For a different prototyping option, consider Justinmind, whose free plan includes one project, unlimited screens and viewers, UI design, wireframing, and interactive input forms. Marvel has a free one-user, one-project plan, while its Pro plan is $12 a month billed yearly for one user and unlimited projects; it may suit a solo user looking for a simpler project-based starting point. Proto.io offers a free plan capped at one active project and five prototype screens, while ProtoPie allows two saved cloud prototypes, eight scenes per prototype, and 50MB of cloud storage on its free plan.

Figma Slides is another freemium option, with unlimited drafts and 150 AI credits per day plus 500 per month in its Starter plan. Plasmic offers a free forever plan with three collaborators and unlimited projects. Zeplin Flows has a free tier with one project, 100 screens, and unlimited members, but no Flow Boards. Penpot is another alternative.

For broader category browsing, see Prototyping Software, UI design tools, Developer Handoff Software, Design Collaboration Software, Web Design Software, and AI UI Design Generators.

Verdict

Choose UXPin if your team needs behavior-rich prototypes, coded libraries, and broad collaboration in one workflow. Core offers substantial prototyping capability, but its seven-day history and 200 monthly AI credits are meaningful constraints; teams needing longer retention, administration, or higher allowances should budget for Growth or Enterprise. Look elsewhere if a two-prototype free tier is not enough to evaluate or sustain your work.