Acta vs Avoma

Acta records Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams meetings, then creates transcripts, summaries and action items. Meetings can be captured by a bot, or recorded from a user's computer through the desktop app or Chrome extension without a notetaker joining. Ask Acta searches selected meeting transcripts and answers questions across them. Role-specific templates can generate outputs such as sales reports, interview scorecards, product requirements, tickets and clinical notes. Listed integrations include Google Calendar, Outlook, Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Monday.com and Gmail, along with the meeting platforms. Acta says recordings and notes remain in the user's account unless shared, and meeting data is encrypted in transit and at rest. The free plan provides 600 minutes of storage and limited AI summaries and action points; Pro lists unlimited transcription, AI summaries and storage. Pricing is on request, and a 15-day trial is listed. Enterprise includes options such as on-premise deployment, SSO, APIs, private storage and custom data retention.

Avoma captures meetings with a bot and provides transcripts, summaries, and action items. It works on the web, iOS, and Android, and captures meetings on Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, and GoToMeeting. Transcription supports 62 languages, and calendar integrations are included. A free view-only user can watch recordings, view notes and transcripts, comment, and share. Paid plans are billed annually: Startup costs $19 a month for up to 25 paid seats, and Organization costs $29 a month for up to 100 paid seats. Both include unlimited free view-only seats. Enterprise costs $39 a month, is billed annually only, and requires at least 10 paid seats. Avoma was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Palo Alto, California, United States.