Alchemer vs ENA Survey
Alchemer
alchemer.comENA Survey
enasurvey.comSide by side
| Figure | Alchemer | ENA Survey |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $26.25/mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | Yes | — |
| Android | Yes | — |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 15 | 0 |
| Spec score · Survey Software | 9.4 (#2) | 7.3 (#111) |
| Response analytics | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Integrations | The platform advertises integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Zendesk, Microsoft Excel and more than 400 business systems. | The site lists outbound webhooks and SMS gateways including NetGSM, Bird, Twilio, Infobip, and custom webhooks. |
| Intended users | Alchemer describes its audience as customer-obsessed teams and highlights multi-location businesses, mission-based organizations, and teams across industries. | The site presents ENA Survey as an enterprise survey platform for teams conducting research and collecting feedback across on-site and remote audiences. |
| Product | Alchemer describes its platform as a way to capture feedback across surveys, reviews, social media, listings, websites, and apps, then connect that feedback to business systems and take action. | ENA Survey is an enterprise survey platform for building surveys, collecting responses, and analyzing results. |
| Survey builder | The survey product provides drag-and-drop creation, advanced logic and branching, more than 40 question types and mobile-optimized surveys. | The builder supports sections, question groups, required fields, drag-and-drop questions, reusable templates, and live previews. |
Plans
Alchemer
- FreeFree
- Collaborator$55 a month
- CollaboratorPriced on request
- Professional$165 a month
- ProfessionalPriced on request
- Full Access$275 a month
- Full AccessPriced on request
- Business PlatformPriced on request
- Free PlanFree
- Collaborator Monthly$55 a month
In their own words
ENA Survey
ENA Survey has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.