AutoSplitter vs Opus
AutoSplitter
autosplitter.comOpus
imageaccess.comSide by side
| Figure | AutoSplitter | Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Spec score · Photo Scanning Software | 8.3 (#9) | 6.9 (#29) |
| Metadata | Captions can be saved as visible text, metadata, or both; the site says JPEG and TIFF captions use EXIF metadata and PNG captions use IDAT chunks. | It captures hierarchical metadata using templates with configurable required, optional, repeatable, and single-value fields. |
| Purpose | AutoSplitter scans batches of physical photographs, separates them into individual image files, restores colors, and supports captions and metadata. | Opus WorkFlow creates and manages digitized assets for preservation, archives, and digital collections, including for libraries, museums, and archives. |
Plans
In their own words
AutoSplitter
AutoSplitter has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.