Avoma vs Wudpecker

Avoma captures meetings with a bot and provides transcripts, summaries, and action items. It works on the web, iOS, and Android, and captures meetings on Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, and GoToMeeting. Transcription supports 62 languages, and calendar integrations are included. A free view-only user can watch recordings, view notes and transcripts, comment, and share. Paid plans are billed annually: Startup costs $19 a month for up to 25 paid seats, and Organization costs $29 a month for up to 100 paid seats. Both include unlimited free view-only seats. Enterprise costs $39 a month, is billed annually only, and requires at least 10 paid seats. Avoma was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Palo Alto, California, United States.

Wudpecker records meetings and turns them into searchable transcripts and organized follow-up. It provides AI summaries, speaker labels, action-item tracking, and note templates, while its archive lets users search past meeting material. Wudpecker is available on web, Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android. The Free plan costs nothing and is billed monthly; it allows 10 meetings per month with the notetaker bot and 3 Ask AI questions per recording. Plus costs $19 a month, billed monthly, and includes 30 meetings per month with the bot. Pro costs $32 a month, billed monthly, with 100 bot meetings per month. The pricing note describes paid access as starting from $19/user/mo and lists a 14-day trial. The plan limits are centered on monthly meeting volume, so the relevant tier depends on how many meetings need bot coverage. Transcription, summaries, speaker labeling, and action items provide a set of tools for capturing conversations and locating their follow-up later.